ARTUZ v ZANU PF - Applicants Heads of Argument

BACKGROUND

1. This application has been brought on an urgent basis seeking an interdict to stop a political party from compelling school children and their teachers from attending its political rallies, causing the closure of schools for their political rallies, and using school property for their political rallies including school premises, busses and furniture.

ARTUZ v ZANU PF - First Respondents Opposing Affidavit

BE PLEASED TO TAKE NOTICE THAT the 1st Respondent intends to oppose the Urgent Chamber application filed by Applicants.

FURTHER TAKE NOTICE THAT the affidavit of HON DR.

ARTUZ v ZANU PF - First Respondents Heads of Argument

POINT IN LIMINE

1.

Application for Leave to Execute Pending Appeal - ARTUZ v ZANU PF

TAKE NOTICE THAT an URGENT CHAMBER APPLICATION is hereby made for an Order in terms of the Draft Order annexed to this Application on the grounds that:

Notice of Appeal - ZANU PF v ARTUZ

Notice of Appeal

A. TAKE NOTICE that Appellant hereby appeals against the whole of the judgement of the High Court of Zimbabwe, Masvingo per Mafusire J, in Case No. HC 263/18.

B.

UN welcomes the High Court decision to protect children from being forced to attend political rallies

3 July 2018, Harare - The UN welcomes the High Court decision to protect children from being forced to attend political rallies.

ARTUZ & Another V ZANU-PF & Another Urgent Chamber Application for an Interim Interdict

Factual Background

Mangwiro v Minister of JLPA - March 2017 - Mushore J

TENDAI BLESSING MANGWIRO

versus

THE MINISTER OF JUSTICE & LEGAL AFFAIRS (N.O.)

and

THE MINISTER OF HOME AFFAIRS (N.O)

and

THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF ZIMBABWE (N.O.)

HIGH COURT OF HARARE ZIMBABWE

MUSHORE J

HARARE, 30 November 2016 & 15 March 2017

Court Application (Constitution of Zimbabwe- State Liabilities Act- Declaration of invalidity)

T. Zhawarara, for the applicant

H. Magadure, for the respondents

HC 12441-16 Zibani v Judicial Service Commission & Others [Chief Justice Interviews Case]

ROMEO TAOMBERA ZIBANI
versus
JUDICIAL SERVICE COMMMISSION
and
HIS EXCELLENCY, THE PRESIDENT OF THE
REPUBLIC OF ZIMBAB\VE, CDE ROBERT GABRIEL MUGABE N.O.
and
MINISTER OF JUSTICE AND LEGAL AND
PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS, HON VICE PRESIDENT
EMMERSON DAMBUDZO MNANGAGW A N.O.
and
CHIEF JUSTICE GODFREY CHIDYAUSIKU JA
and
DEPUTY CHIEF JUSTICE LUKE MALABA JA
and
HONURABLE JUSTICE RITA MAKARAU JA
and
HONOURABLE JUSTICE PADDINGTON GARWE JA
and

Democratic Assembly for Restoration & Empowerment (DARE) and others v Newbert Saunyama and others Applicant's Heads of Arguments

HC8940/2016

Democratic Assembly for Restoration & Empowerment (DARE) and others v Newbert Saunyama and others Provisional Order

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ZIMBABWE CASE No. HC 8940/16

HELD AT HARARE

In the matter between

DEMOCRATIC ASSEMBLY FOR RESTORATION & EMPOWERMENT (DARE)

STENDRICK ZVORWADZA

COMBINED HARARE RESIDENCE ASSOCIATION NATIONAL ELECTORAL REFORM AGENDA (NERA)

AND

NEWBERT SAUNYAMA

THE COMMISSIONER GENERAL OF POLICE

THE MINISTER OF HOME AFFAIRS

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ZIMBABWE

PROVISIONAL ORDER

Democratic Assembly for Restoration & Empowerment (DARE) and others v Newbert Saunyama and others Urgent Chamber Application for Declaratory Order

In the matter between:

1^st APPLICANT 2^nd APPLICANT 3^rd APPLICANT 4^th APPLICANT

DEMOCRATIC ASSEMBLY FOR RESTORATION & EMPOWERMENT (DARE)

STENDRICK ZVORWADZA

COMBINED HARARE RESIDENCE ASSOCIATION NATIONAL ELECTORAL REFORM AGENDA (NERA)

HH 645-14 STATE v MUTSINZE

THE STATE

v

JONATHAN MUTSINZE

(HH 645-14 & CRB 08/2000)

HIGH COURT OF ZIMBABWE

HUNGWE J

HARARE, 15 October 2014

veritaszim

High Court