HH 567-23 The State v Blessed Sixpence and Ors (Sentencing Guidelines Judgment)

Criminal Review- The sentencing guidelines

Chironga Anor v Minister of Justice Legal Parliamentary Affairs (CCZ 14 of 2020) 2020 ZWCC 14 (23 September 2020) Case on Section 210 of the Constitution Judgment

HLATSHWA YO JCC: One of the crucial elements of the new constitutional dispension ushered in by the 2013 Constitution is to make a decisive break from turning a blind eye to constitutional obligations. To achieve this goal, the drafters of the Zimbabwean Constitution Amendment (No.20) Act, 2013 ("the Constitution") adopted the rule of law and supremacy of the Constitution as some of the core founding values and principles of our ·constitutional democracy.

HC 2021-2128 MUSA KIKA VS MINISTER OF JUSTICE, LEGAL & PARLIARMENTARY AFFAIRS + 19 OTHERS JUDGMENT

Veritas cannot vouch for this document's accuracy. The full judgment is also available on this website here.

J U D G M E N T

ZHOU J: What we have is a summary of the judgment in respect of that two matters. The full detailed judgment will be availed in due course with full reasons.

SC 56-20 - MDC et al v Mashavira et al - Supreme Court judgment of 31st March 2020

The full judgment of the Supreme Court in this case can be downloaded below.

The judgment concerns the leadership dispute in the Movement for Democratic Change formerly led by the late Morgan Tsvangirai (MDC), who died in February 2018.

CCZ 2019-21 Nelson Chamisa and 24 Ors v Emmerson Mnangagwa - Election Petition

FULL JUDGMENT

MALABA CJ: On 24 August 2018 the Constitutional Court (“the Court”) handed down the abridged version of the judgment in the case in which the applicant challenged the validity of the Presidential election held on 30 July 2018.

ARTUZ v ZANU PF – Judgment of Mafusire J 17 July 2018 – granting leave to appeal

MAFUSIRE J

[1] THis is an application for leave to execute pending appeal, On 28 July 2018 I granted an interim interdict in the following terms:

ARTUZ v ZANU PF – Judgment of Mafusire J - 28 June 2018

The first respondent is the ruling patty in Zimbabwe. The second respondent is a minister of government in charge of primary and secondary education. He is a member of the first respondent. The matter before me was an urgent chamber application by the applicants for an interdict against the respondents. The first applicant is a trade union of primary and secondary school teachers in rural Zimbabwe. It is duly registered.

Search form